Cometary

Reimagining NEVER FALL IN LOVE

NEVER FALL IN LOVE is a David Partridge song written years ago. It’s worn several arrangements, none of which quite fit, at least not to Buck and David’s satisfaction.

The problem was that with each successive version, the arrangement of the song just got bigger and more dramatic and, we admit it, longer. But the song itself is a relationship song and was originally written to have an intimacy; that intimacy had been lost.

So we decided to revisit Never Fall In Love with the intent of bringing a bit more whisper to a song that, frankly, was beginning to shout.

That wasn’t easy. Some cool electric guitar work from Buck fell by the wayside. Fortunately, some cool acoustic guitar work from Buck replaced it, supplemented by some clean electric work. His nicely crunchy solo in the middle remained. Hey, no need to go crazy!

The drums and percussion were next. A massive drum kit (there were even timbales in there) was replaced by a mélange of hand percussion. The groove is a blend of cajon, high hat, djembe and frame drum for those interested in the details. For those with less interest, a bunch of quieter stuff will suffice.

The vocals were next step in the renovation. This version of the song has a brand new vocal by David in keeping with the more personal feel of the new tracks. To bring a little warmth, we asked our friend Virginia (Vee) Evans to sing on the chorus. Vee has a rich, warm voice that brings a special timbre to the harmonies on the refrain. Some of the texture comes from the fact that Buck’s part is actually higher than the one being sung by Vee. She also contributed some countermelody parts that inspired the woven vocals in the coda.

One of the Comets’ very good friends told us that he vaguely recalls a previous version of the tune and asked that the old version be posted for forensic comparison. But, the thing is, we didn’t like the previous version. That’s why we went to the trouble of reimagining it!

One element that was not reimagined is Howard Rabkin’s fine bass line, a big solid reggae-inspired wonder that manages to be even more effective without the relative bombast of the drums and big guitars of the original.

Reading back, it seems that this entire note is a musical version of “Flip This House”. Who knows, Postcard Comets may yet be cable-worthy. As long as it’s not a spot on “Nancy Grace”!

We hope you enjoy Never Fall In Love. Be sure to take a moment to leave a comment.


Quantcast


IN THE ROOM – a bit of a departure for POSTCARD COMETS?

Anyone who drops by here with any regularity has likely read that we’ve been working with singer/songwriter Dolores Dagenais. In fact, we recently posted a duet with Dolores called Never Seen The Mountains. The entire experience of working with another artist was a reminder of how a bit of collaboration with someone who does not live inside your own brain can be a good thing.

When we first heard the songs Dolores had assembled for the album, a couple of tunes that had a bit of a swing feel. They’re not jazz of course; none of us would be so presumptuous as to suggest such a thing. But the feel that Dol used for a couple of her songs took us to a place that the Comets had not previously explored. Buck, who would call himself a country-based player, was particularly responsive to the fresh air.

Coincidentally, I had been experimenting a few months ago with a rhythm idea that had a bit of swing to it. It inspired a song called In The Room. I wrote it, demoed it and, honestly, forgot about it.

Then I heard Buck’s playing on Dolores’ tunes. I played the In The Room demo to Buck and he liked it.

So, here’s In The Room. I’m not going to say it was an easy piece to produce– we all know that “new tricks” saying and it’s fair to characterize both Buck and I as “old dogs”. But if this latest Postcard Comets tune sounds even a tiny but different, and it may seem no more than that, now you know the reason why. We stuck a toe outside the Comets’ comfort zone and In The Room is the result.

We’re inclined to blame Dolores.

We hope you’ll give In The Room a listen and post a comment here on the site. We love to read them and we pay attention to what you say!

David
POSTCARD COMETS


Quantcast


Escaping 2009 For The Promise Of 2010

Those of you who visit us here with any frequency may have noticed that the last six months of 2009 have been a hiatus period for POSTCARD COMETS. True, both Buck and David have been toiling away on the next Dolores Dagenais album, tentatively entitled Big Girl Art. That was a lot of work and a lot of fun and everyone is looking forward to its release in the Spring of 2010.

But that’s not all that’s been going on in Songville. The intensely wet summer moved Buck to build an ark in his basement only to have to dissemble it when he realized it wouldn’t go out the back door. David played the Stateside Gathering this summer with honorary Comet Howard Rabkin. As it turned out, the torrential rain they drove through on the return trip made them regret not bringing Buck’s Ark. There’s a rough clip of their performance on youTube if you haven’t seen it (and it’s fair to say that the majority of the world has not). In the clip they appear to be relatively dry at that particular point in the adventure.

OK, enough deflection. Let’s admit here and now that the musical leviathan known as POSTCARD COMETS has not been as productive in the posting of new songs this past six months. But they’ve vowed to change their slothful ways and get some new tracks up here on the website pretty soon. There’s even talk of a recording project with Howard Rabkin if he can tear himself away from the other 12 bands to which he belongs.

Will they post new work? Yes. Will they continue to post for the following 12 months without fail? Well, first David has to go into CNN detox and as for Buck, there’s been some dark talk about a dirigible…

Thanks for listening, everyone and here’s to a healthy and productive 2010!

Tweaks Tatum
Official Corporate Spokesperson
for
POSTCARD COMETS


IN PRAISE OF RUNNING WATER

I recently had reason, need more accurately, to tackle some plumbing in my house. For those who know me well, and know that the idea of me doing anything with a wrench is spine-freezing, be assured that it was only a set of faucets. But, they were the source of a leak that had progressed to another floor so the work was not optional.

But this is not about my absence of hand tool savvy. It’s about the fact that I had to shut off the water to the entire household to attend to the task at hand. Because I had to remove the taps and the sink and the attached drain, the water had to be off. Even I knew that.

This meant a significant number of hours without water. Now, I have a friend who lives part of the week in a cabin with no running water. He showers at the local KOA campground. But I am not such a hearty soul. I like my taps to flow, my toilet to flush and my shower head to rain down clean clear, temperature-controlled water.

All of this has me thinking about wonders taken for granted: the love of my family, yes, electricity, certainly, and even the blessed miracle of garbage pickup. But it may not surprise some that it also has me thinking about music.

I record regularly with a certain musician. For purposes of anonymity, let’s call him “Buck”. Buck and I record together as a band. Let’s, for fun, call this band “Postcard Comets”. What Buck and I do not do with any regularity as Postcard Comets is perform live. When an opportunity to play in Cleveland this month arose, Buck’s family obligations prevented him from going. That and the fact that he’s wanted in at least fifteen states.

Now, by rights, I should have been screwed. Based on compelling prior evidence, I do not rate my talents as a solo performer. So did I turn down the gig? I did not. I picked up the phone and called another friend of many years. For the purposes of this story, let’s call him “Howard Rabkin”. Howard is a bassist, guitarist and singer of no small ability. He went with me to Cleveland and I think it’s fair to say that the gig went fine, primarily because I have a resource like Howard that can be relied on to elevate the quality of my music and my life.

Parallel to all of this, I’ve been working with a singer songwriter called Dolores Dagenais. She asked me to produce her next album. Because I love her work, I accepted. Now, Dol, did not ask me to produce her because I’m a great musician or a fabulous producer or because I’m devilishly handsome (although this must have played some part… a small part, tiny even. OK, none.) She asked because she likes the recordings I’ve produced for Postcard Comets.

But the Comets are not just me. I recently sent one of Dolores’ songs to Buck, asking him to send me a guitar part. He did not. He sent two. These two parts are very different from one another but when I added them to Dol’s song, they fit perfectly, not only with Dol’s part but with each other. All I did was turn on the tap.

So we’re back to the plumbing. When those taps were installed and the sink was repositioned into the counter top and the drain was reconnected, I cannot tell you how sweet the sound of that flowing water. For me, longtime friends and intuitive musicians like Buck and Howard are that flowing water. Without them, I’d be lost, overheated and unhygienic.

To them I raise a glass. Of tap water, of course.

David Partridge
POSTCARD COMETS


COMETS Sighted in Cleveland!

This crucial video evidence of the existence of POSTCARD COMETS is from August 8th, 2009 in Lakewood, Ohio, a suburb of Cleveland. The gig is the Gathering Stateside, organized by Jo Robinson under the auspices of the Artistic Freedom Collective.
Thanks to the camera skills of singer/songwriter Trevor Marty (www.trevormarty.com), we offer this clip of David (guitar) and Howard (bass) dipping into the oldies bag for a song written by Joe South and originally released by Billy Joe Royal.
This POSTCARD COMETS rendition is a bit rough-and-ready and key COMET Buck Wilburn is absent (there are dark rumours of borderphobia and even some evidence of involuntary incarceration) but hey, it’s “live” in all its ragged glory. But be warned: it’s so ragged, it may not be here for long…
We hope you enjoy the clip and be sure to leave a comment in the box below. We love your feedback!
David

“>


DRIVING IN THE RAIN

We just returned from a gig in Cleveland so the whole idea of playing live is on my mind.

I’ll admit to being more of a songwriter/recordist than a live performer. I sing wearing headphones when I record, most often to a track developed earlier, knowing exactly how the track is going to sound as add my vocal.

There is good and bad in this, as in all things. You know the foundation over which you play is not going to shift, so you’re free to explore your performance without the danger of stepping on another player’s best moments. But unless the band is playing in the room as you perform, the shooting star thrill and danger of an organic, changing performance is, by definition, absent. The process of recording offers focus but forfeits the opportunity for a lightning strike of communal improvisation.

Sounds like a lot to lose, right? Well, let’s chase the metaphor: how many of us have ever been struck by lightning? Very few, of course. But who has not marveled at the beauty of nature’s fury simply by seeing it unfold? The power of a storm seen from a distance is less dramatic than a hissing bolt striking a few inches from your flip-flops. But a safe-distance storm is more frequently experienced and more universally enjoyed.

I choose to experience a storm without standing in the middle of a meadow. For me, the frequent small inspirations of recording are preferable to the sparser, more searing thrill of live performance. Now that we’ve beaten the lightning image to death, let’s move on.

Why do I feel the thrill of live performance infrequently? Well, for a start, I play live infrequently! But the other factor for the performer is what you hear and how you hear it. Even the seemingly simple combination of a single voice and guitar, filtered through amplification, room shape and size, audience participation and the imbalance of just two aural elements can render me clueless as to whether I’m communicating from that stage or not.

And the larger the ensemble, the greater the number of elements that can obscure what you hear. After the show this past weekend, my co-Comet asked about a detail of his performance. I pride myself on my ability to listen but I didn’t hear the element he was describing. Why? During the song in question, I couldn’t hear my own instrument and I was trying to adapt to that while simultaneously thinking about the vocal parts our guest performer and I were about to add to the chorus.

When so many factors – instrumentation, audience, room, balance, lyric – are flying by simultaneously onstage, you, or at least I, can’t take it all in. It’s pin-the-tail-on-the-love song. You’re flying through cloud-cover, you’re driving in the rain. This is an aspect of the thrill, of course. But another aspect is that lightning can flash and you can miss it. And so, I suggest, can your audience.

So, forgive me if I think that my satisfaction lies more in the glowing, repeatable moments you find in a great recording than in the brilliant, infrequent flashes on a stage. I won’t stop performing when asked but I will stop asking so much of the performance itself. I can drive in the rain but I prefer a clear horizon.

David Partridge


THE BALANCE

Sidestepping the tar pit of authenticity or what is or is not real, here’s the core appeal of the acoustic performer as I see it: if the electricity goes off, you can sit on the edge of the stage and play something. As long as you don’t play louder than you sing, people will recognize it as communication and possibly even entertainment. And as traditional acappella performers and instrumentalists will demonstrate, you don’t even need both, just one or the other.
Not that you ever want it to come to that. At least, I don’t. Anyone who regularly boils a kettle knows that electricity’s not a bad thing. Onstage, we use microphones, a PA and pickups on our guitars. We are not purely acoustic. Acoustic sensibility or no, I can’t blame artists for turning to current technology in an attempt to give the best performance they can.

Read the rest of this entry »


WELCOME TO OUR FACELIFT!

May 4, 2009
If you’re reading this you’ve had a chance to experience our new look and layout at postcardcomets.com. This is the freshly painted home of the decidedly unpainted POSTCARD COMETS. We hope you’ll find it less cluttered and easier to navigate.
We have a master player on every page now because, after all, the music is what it’s all about. Some of our visitors told us that they liked to use the site as a radio – “ALL COMETS! ALL THE TIME!”. This is tremendously flattering and the master player is a way to facilitate that usage as well as a way to say thanks.

Read the rest of this entry »


Live Music, Studio Music

Back at the dawn of popular music, live performance and recording were not greatly dissimilar. When Louis Armstrong’s Hot Five went into the studio near the beginning of the last century, there was a single microphone. The mic, and the musicians for that matter, were positioned and repositioned until the balance was right. When Armstrong played live, there was no microphone; where they stood was determined by Louis and the dimensions of the bandstand. But everyone played together.
With the introduction of multitracking, live and recorded music diverged and emerged as separate art forms. Live is kinetic and visual; momentary lapses in musical precision fly by in a pulsebeat; we’re held by the moment we’re in. Recordings are precise, repeatable and subject to the scrutiny that familiarity brings. I think that songs need the precision of a recording to endear themselves and a live performance to consummate the relationship.  Live is physical contact; recordings are long distance love.
But you can’t get physical on a website. Not on this one, anyway. There are functions crucial to a live performance’s success that, in the studio, are just easier or more expedient to do piecemeal. You can play multiple instruments, adding ideas and parts as inspiration strikes. If a player is unavailable, the music goes on.
All of this was brought to mind by a song of ours called ANGRY WORDS. The song is not a Postcard Comets duo performance. But everyone we consider a Comet is on there— same writer, producer, vocalist, and guitarist as the other songs we’ve featured on the site. But this song has a different feel, thanks substantially to the players we don’t regularly feature, but also to our intention to capture the energy of “live”. Why try to blur dissimilar disciplines? Same reason anyone does, I suspect – it seemed best for the song. For me, that’s always the destination.
David Partridge


Songs As Postcards

(This Blog was originally posted on this date 2 years ago. As we celebrate our revamped site, we thought it was fitting to repost the blog that was the beginning of Cometary.)

Postcards are a lot like songs. Each is comprised of two forms of communication, picture and text in the case of the postcard, music and lyrics in the case of the song. This isn’t why the COMETS are POSTCARD COMETS, of course; the name uses the adjectival sense of postcard, meaning distillation and brevity. It’s not a novel, it’s not even a letter. It’s a postcard.
Postcards are a previous century’s version of text messaging, a quick thought in a compact space. The message itself can be trite, cryptic, even indecipherable. It can brighten your day or touch your heart. Generally, the glossy picture is the postcard’s attention grabber but the words are what makes it worth sending.
That’s kind of how songs work for me. An attractive melody is diminished by a lyric that does not resonate. Alternatively, if a song has a pedestrian melody and a great lyric, I still enjoy it. But I don’t enjoy it often. It seems to me that for a song to be a repeatable pleasure, both the lyric and the music have to be strong and complementary.
And what about performance? The analogy weakens here. Very little of a postcard’s appeal is based in penmanship although extreme scribbling can certainly obliterate its meaning. Conversely, the performance animates a song. Or smothers it.
The performance contextualizes a song as well. Take the R&B classic War, for instance. Edwin Starr’s original is incensed, aggressive and angry. Joan Osborne’s more recent version is full of sadness and regret, as if resigned to the everlasting vitality of human folly. Very different readings and I like them both. Or what about Layla, Derek and the Dominoes contrasted with Clapton’s unplugged reading? Same song, same artist, very different emotional contexts.
I’m sure you can think of other, possibly better, examples. I’m pretty much done here. This particular postcard is taking on the attributes of a letter. Or a novel.
Or a song by Yes.
David Partridge


Farewell, Van Johnson

I read today that actor Van Johnson died last week. He’s not on the tip of many tastemaker tongues these days but back in the middle of the 20th Century he was hot stuff. I know this because my father told me it was true.
My dad was a modest movie buff, a fan of ‘40s stuff like A Guy Named Joe, Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo and State Of The Union with my man Spencer Tracy. I suspect that my movie obsession comes from my father and, by extension, from actors like Van Johnson. Of the movies I’ve mentioned, he was in every one.
Van wasn’t just a “serious” actor, he also did musicals like Brigadoon and Damn Yankees and even The Music Man on stage in London. I read once that one of his first screen roles was in Too Many Girls in the esteemed role of Chorus Boy #41. I didn’t know much about this aspect of Mr. Johnson when I met him briefly in the ‘80s. He was not at the peak of his career at this point but he done a cameo in Woody Allen’s Purple Rose Of Cairo in ’85. At that time I worked for a video company that released the film on cassette— VHS and Beta!
So, when I heard that he was to be the guest of honour at a gala held annually in the Canadian video industry, I was kind of curious. The promoter of this annual affair had an admirable knack for getting a major Hollywood name of the heritage variety to appear at these events year after year. I don’t remember what year this was, exactly, but I’m sure it was late ‘80s because my father was seriously ill. Candidly, this made the flesh and blood appearance of one of his favourites all the more poignant for me.
The affair was an awards dinner held in a hotel ballroom. Everyone dressed in stuff they usually only wore to funerals. We assembled at tables of 10 before a long dais reserved for video industry elite; by this I mean Canadian video industry elite and by that I mean the folks who spent the most money advertising in the magazine published by the event’s host. At the centre of this long dais was a podium; your importance in the industry was inversely proportional to the distance of your chair from the central podium. Van Johnson sat in the first seat to the podium’s right.
This particular year, in order to make presenters and winners seem more august, the event designer had decided to push the section of the dais that held the podium forward by about 4 feet, giving it the appearance of the prow of a ship. Unfortunately, said designer had not seen to the addition of an offsetting 5 feet of flooring behind the podium to compensate for where the prow section was not. As much as the prow protruded aforeship, it was absent in the aft.
We learned this rather early when a local actor known for playing a cheerful bald shopkeeper in lottery commercials strode robustly toward the podium, waving like a vaudevillian. Just short of the lectern, he dropped like an anchor. Not even his buoy-like head was left bobbing. Fortunately the man was not hurt but those happy-go-lucky lottery spots were never the same to me. I kept imagining the poor bugger on the verge of a trap door.
However, the hapless micro-celebrity had done us all a service, alerting us to the dais’ design flaw. Because we were mid-occasion, of course, the show did indeed go on. They did not stop to fix the absence of back end on the prow of the dais. But that absence did not escape the attention of an observant few. One of those was Van Johnson.
Now, anyone who has watched the Oscars knows that these events, even modest Canadian knockoffs of these events, are likely to be long. Longer than the dais. Longer still than the line at the bar. It was a cash bar, of course, but not, it must be said, for Mr. Johnson. It may have been my own evolving state of mind but it seemed to me that, as the wine flowed, our guest of honour grew less and less circumspect and, it must be said, more and more theatrical. He started the night in A Guy Named Joe and progressed slowly but noticeably towards Brigadoon.
Of course, this may have been only my perception as unaccustomed as I was, and am, to film royalty. But this is where I enter the story. In the latter hours of the long fermented evening, a film my company represented won an award. It was my moment to walk the dais. Although the left end of it was closer, I chose to approach the podium from the right side of the long dais in order to walk by Mr. Van Johnson. Such was my admiration and the desire to have a better story for my next visit to my father.
I was not disappointed. Just as I approached the left shoulder of the great man, he turned to face me and, looking directly at me, said something that has guided my steps every day since. Looking to his left and gesturing dramatically to his right, Van Johnson locked eyes with me and bellowed, “Don’t fall into the fucking pit, son!”
When I told this tale to my father, he shook with laughter. Van Johnson, however inadvertently, had once again brought light into the life of a fan. My father died shortly thereafter. I think of him a lot. I think less often of his favourite, Van Johnson. But tonight I’m thinking about them both. And I’m grateful for the moments Van Johnson brought to my father, and by extension, to me.
David Partridge


The Official Blog of Postcard Comets

Songs As Postcards
March 28, 2007
Postcards are a lot like songs. Each is comprised of two forms of communication, picture and text in the case of the postcard, music and lyrics in the case of the song. This isn’t why the COMETS are POSTCARD COMETS, of course; the name uses the adjectival sense of postcard, meaning distillation and brevity. It’s not a novel, it’s not even a letter. It’s a postcard.
Postcards are a previous century’s version of text messaging, a quick thought in a compact space. The message itself can be trite, cryptic, even indecipherable. It can brighten your day or touch your heart. Generally, the glossy picture is the postcard’s attention grabber but the words are what makes it worth sending.
That’s kind of how songs work for me. An attractive melody is diminished by a lyric that does not resonate. Alternatively, if a song has a pedestrian melody and a great lyric, I still enjoy it. But I don’t enjoy it often. It seems to me that for a song to be a repeatable pleasure, both the lyric and the music have to be strong and complementary.
And what about performance? The analogy weakens here. Very little of a postcard’s appeal is based in penmanship although extreme scribbling can certainly obliterate its meaning. Conversely, the performance animates a song. Or smothers it.
The performance contextualizes a song as well. Take the R&B classic War, for instance. Edwin Starr’s original is incensed, aggressive and angry. Joan Osborne’s more recent version is full of sadness and regret, as if resigned to the everlasting vitality of human folly. Very different readings and I like them both. Or what about Layla, Derek and the Dominoes contrasted with Clapton’s unplugged reading? Same song, same artist, very different emotional contexts.
I’m sure you can think of other, possibly better, examples. I’m pretty much done here. This particular postcard is taking on the attributes of a letter. Or a novel.
Or a song by Yes.

David Partridge


Clandestiny Defined

I can barely remember where the first droplet of this song came from. But I think it went like this:
My computer takes a bit of time to boot and have a habit of doodling at the piano while waiting for the sign-in message. Sometimes this produces the musical version of gibberish but every so often…
Anyway, it’s my opinion that the genesis of this song, that opening piano figure, was a lightning strike and not a light drizzle. You may see it differently. But after I had the piano figure, the whole thing came in a downpour. The first line led to the second which suggested the third and pretty soon I was at the chorus. I will admit that a line from Bob Marley’s Small Axe inspired the hatchet and the tree in the second line, turning Bob’s message of oppressed populism into something pertaining more to carnal justice. Thanks, Bob. You kept me rolling right to the last line of that chorus.
And that’s when it happened. I’ll admit it, I opted for an invented word.
There is no such word as Clandestiny, it’s true. But it just seemed to fit; everything in the lyric that comes before it is like a cloudburst of explanation, as if the definition came before the word instead of after as it does in the dictionary.
Clandestiny is the fate that befalls someone who chooses a life of secrets or more likely of deceipt. That’s how I see it. It’s not a real word but it should be.
The rest of the lyric, with the exception of the chant, just followed from there, like the low rumble after the lightning. I whipped up a quick rhythm track (piano bass drums) so that I could remember the thing. Then I played it to Buck at the end of a session for something else.
I should mention that Buck’s lovely snaky electric guitar line came from something I call blind tracking, meaning that he heard only the groove and not the tune and most certainly not the lyric. Sometimes I do this to try to shake things up—” play whatever you want wherever you want. If I don’t like it, that’s why God made the mute button!” If the player feels the track, you can get some great stuff even without all the elements present. I may have la-la-laed the tune in the room once or twice as he played but I sure didn’t sing the whole melody with a lyric.
Why, you ask? I was not yet committed. I had a lyric with a made-up word, for heaven’s sake! What if Buck hated it? What if I hated it by the next morning? So the blind tracking had two benefits— it freed Buck to play in a looser structure and it saved me from presenting the lyric as finished.
Which, as it turned out, it was not. I wanted something to summarize the distain the singer had for his subject but also something that conveyed the fact that the dread she felt was the product of her own actions. Hence, the “Somebody knows..” part. When I had that, it was then, and only then, that I decided that I had a song. With a made up word… for the title, if you can believe it.
David Partridge


Must Be The Radio

A few years ago, pre-POSTCARD COMETS but by no means before my musical partnership with Buck Wilburn, he asked me to produce a CD for a band he was in. The band was the Altona Kahunas  and the CD was called Live Off The Floor. It was literally that, a recording of a 5 piece guitar band recorded all at once—instruments, vocals, harmonies and solos— all from a garage just East of Altona Road in Pickering Ontario.
The garage belonged to a friend called Tim Hewie.
To say that Tim was the leader of the Kahunas would be a purposeful misrepresentation of the vibrant chaos of those sessions and, I think it’s fair to say, of the band itself. However, Tim was, to my eye,  the driving energy behind the band, the rehearsals and the sessions themselves. He was the host, the cheerleader and the taskmaster of the enterprise. He even brewed the beer in the garage’s fridge, and when that ancient mechanism started contributing a noise more fearsome than the music itself, he was the guy who went out and bought a new one.
Buck wrote a lot of tunes for that CD and Tim wrote a couple as well. But among my favourites from the bunch was a tune of Buck’s called Must Be The Radio. It represented the breezy side of what the Kahunas did and much of its appeal was the lead vocal by Tim Hewie.
Tim is no longer with us. It’s been a couple of years now. I’ve wanted to do a Comets version of Must Be The Radio for a while but my reticence came from replacing Tim’s vocal. It wasn’t fancy, it wasn’t perfect but it animated Buck’s lyric for me, and really, what more can you ask?  Yes, it’s me singing this Comets version but I’m not singing it instead of Tim, I’m singing it for him, my nod to how he made the song speak to me as a listener.
We hope you like Must Be The Radio. We made it for ourselves and for you. But we made it for Tim as well.
David Partridge


An Old Story Recently Told: The Guardhouse And The Moon

A few months ago I mentioned to Buck that I’d found an old version of The Guardhouse And The Moon and that it was one of the few of my older recordings that I actually thought was properly mixed.
Musicians will possibly understand the rarity of this. Some players dislike hearing recordings of themselves. Many are embarrassed by their older songs, knowing that their craft has moved beyond the point captured in their past work. Even more musicians dislike hearing their older recordings, believing that they can do much better versions now– newer equipment, better chops. Very few artists hear an old recording of an old performance of an old song… and like it.
Now, I’m a model culprit. I find most of my older recordings excruciating. But I thought that the old track of Guardhouse was listenable. I liked it and I decided that, because the song still had some meaning for me, there should be a spanking fresh Comets version.
This was a path fraught with peril. I had relatives that were fond of the old recording of the song. I had no intention of treating the “original” with any respect and I expected trouble. After some deliberation, I lost my nerve. I shelved the idea of rerecording the song.
But then the opportunity to play the Stateside Gathering came my way. I started combing the songbook for potential performance tunes whose beat exceeded my beloved down-tempo crawl. Guardhouse sprang to mind and suddenly a fresh version based on my choppy acoustic guitar entered the repertoire. I opened my set with it and it worked. But I kept thinking that it would be better with Buck’s guitar and not just mine. I think this recording proves that I was right about that aspect at least.
Last month, in the same session that spawned Me For You, we came up with this. It’s different from the original recording— more wood, less synth, more groove, less ice. The Guardhouse And The Moon is not a new song and it’s not a new story. But it’s a true story— its events actually happened to me. I hope that it has some resonance for others.  But speaking for myself, this Comets version feels the way I feel about that story now
And that, as far as I’m concerned, makes The Guardhouse And the Moon a brand new song.
David Partridge


That Song With The Names: The Sequel

(ME FOR YOU is now known as A LITTLE MORE THAN ME. That story’s in a blog above.)
ME FOR YOU, our most recent song, has a history. It was premiered on LOOM and then “bootlegged” from Cleveland thanks to the ReverbNation player on the Gathering Stateside page. Both of these versions are solo performances, basic guitar and voice.
We had always intended to flesh out the arrangement and posted a “studio” version at the beginning of this month.
A lot of our friends didn’t like it. one went so far as to suggested that we’d “butchered” the tune. And while we can assure everyone that no sharp implements or precision bloodletting was involved, there’s no doubt that we intended the version we posted to our page to be different from the live one. to be fair, some listeners were fine with the studio version, particularly those who had never heard the song in a live and/or solo context.
Playing solo, I am genetically predisposed to doing every song s-l-o-w-e-r onstage, so the fact that we accelerated the studio version was intentional. but after revisiting Jay Cox’s recording of that rough performance in Cleveland I’ll admit that I saw the appeal of the slower tempo, and the virtual absence of an arrangement certainly spotlit the lyric.
So, we went back to the studio version, determined to combine the appeal of both, the more soulful tempo and a less busy arrangement of the live version with the texture and polish of the studio cut.
The result is at the top of the MySpace player now. It still has Buck’s fine lead work, bass , brushed drums and a bit of harmonium but the beat is straighter, the bass rounder and that characteristic scrubbed acoustic that was the sole accompaniment live is a little more prominent.
Will it satisfy those who, for all of its flaws, embraced the live version? You tell us.
But know this, we were immensely flattered by the passion this simple song produced amongst our friends, even when the passion manifested as disapproval of the first studio cut.
Thanks, as ever, for your opinions, suggestions, kudos and support. It all fits in with the theme of the song rather nicely, don’t you think?
David Partridge


That Song With The Names

(ME FOR YOU is now known as A LITTLE MORE THAN ME. That story’s in a blog above.)
ME FOR YOU started out on an August afternoon out on the back deck with a frosty drink and a little travel guitar. I was reflecting back on a dream I’d had the night before in which I’d been able to sing amazing high harmonies in whatever key was thrown at me. This was a particularly cruel dream in that I’d been fighting a throat infection and my voice was currently more akin to the sound of a chair in which I was seated being scraped across pressure treated wood.
But like many songs, ME FOR YOU began with a strummed chord and the first words that popped into my head. And then it stopped.
The fact that I couldn’t sing without coughing didn’t help. I carried the one line around for a few days and the next time I took a crack at it, the outline of the melody showed up. I was thinking about the distance between aspiration and actual performance and the whole thing, lyric and tune, flowed from there.
I premiered this song solo on LOOM, the online open mic and then went on to close my “solo Comets” set at the Cleveland Gathering with it as well. That would make this, while not exactly the song’s premiere, certainly the premiere of the actual, unbumbled lyric.
So it began solo, as they most often do, and it stayed solo for a while but I always heard Buck’s guitar on it in my mind. But not much else did. Inspired by the stripped down performances of most of the performers on LOOM and at the Cleveland Gathering, we decided that we needed to do a few tunes based just our guitars and voices.
OK, so we cheated. There’s a bass and brushed drums on there and a harmonium holding a note from each chord. But I play one guitar and Buck plays one guitar and that’s the core of it. We hope you like the sparser sound because there is more of it to come.
Someone asked me who the “You” in the song is. I’m not entirely sure. It could be a loved one, it could be the imagined audience, it could even be me. It’s likely all of the above because pastiche is such a big part of the stuff I write. Lyric writing involves the folding of time and space and the morphing of humans, real and imagined, into a single little snapshot. Some of it’s real some of it’s not. It’s kind of like Photoshop for words.
Someone else asked me who the folks name-checked in the song are. Hey folks, that’s why God made Google! Feel free to uncover them all—this may be the first blog that gives out homework!
They all really mean something to me and it would be a massive coincidence if they held the same weight for you. But honestly, that doesn’t matter. They’re not there to be celebrated, although they’re all certainly worthy of celebration, they’re there to remind us that we all have heroes, or unconscious mentors or spirit guides or whatever you want to call them that inspire us. Their accomplishments point the way up the path to our best work and our better selves.
Now that I think of it, I believe you call a person like that an artist.
David Partridge


A Gathering Of Tribes

I just returned from the Gathering Stateside, an event that brings together performers, songwriters and instrumentalists who originally “met” on MySpace’s Acoustic Forum. The event was fantastic and everyone I met, and I’m serious about this, was a fine person who I would be happy to have live next door to me.
But Jo Robinson, the organizer of the event, and likely others as well, will blog about the details and highlights of the actual event and the interactions of the participants. I’d like to reflect on another part of  my journey.
The day before the formal (perhaps a poor choice of words!) show, a few of us went to the Rock and Roll Hall Of Fame. We were not obvious candidates for this pilgrimage. Allen is a purveyor of the finest and most worthy-of-preservation of past music. But Allen’s definition of past music centers on the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Century. The newest song I have ever heard Allen perform was from the late ’40s. Kimberley is a composer of marvelous keyboard instrumentals, often classical in structure, and is a music director for a church. Virginia is a gifted singer and composer of what used to be called art songs, quiet acoustic pieces with a unique perspective and a strong sense of vignette. Wonderful performers all, but none likely selections for a ripping good sock hop.
It’s fair to say that for a good part of this crew, the Hall Of Fame was a learning experience as opposed to a nostalgic or lifestyle-affirming one. None of the musicians above, at first and even second perusal, have a lot in common with the history of rock music.
Except that we do. It is the foundation upon which music culture, and all popular culture in fact, is precariously stacked. You cannot live in the modern world without feeling the influence of the artists honoured in the Hall Of Fame. No Bo Diddley or Chuck Berry, no Stones or Beatles. No Howlin’ Wolf, no Zeppelin. No Aretha no… well name any number of modern vocal divas for yourself. For my part, I will not put them in the same sentence as the Queen Of Soul.
And on it goes. I would argue no Sly and the Family Stone, no hip hop/ modern R&B/ neo soul, or whatever you want to call it. And on a personal level, it has to be said that no Beatles, no Byrds, no  Zombies, no Dylan, no Stax, no Motown  and yes, no Rick Nelson, no Postcard Comets.
So, regardless of our musical orientation, I think it’s fair to say that we all got something out of the Museum, to say nothing of the gift shop, because of rock music’s staggering contribution not just to music but to the culture in which we are interred.
It’s also fair to say, I think, that I was the biggest fan of the four of us. I was, after all, the only one pointing out glimpses of Randy Meisner in the clips of the Stone Canyon Band. I’m certain I was the only one tempted to smash the display case just to slide the faders on the board that mixed Jimi Hendrix.
But I may also have been the one most disappointed by the experience. As much fun as the Museum was, particularly in such good company, it was, as museums must be, about artifacts. It was not about the thrill of seeing Sly perform, or seeing the blur of Keith Moon behind a kit or having the voice of Etta James move me to tears. It was about stuff. Amazing, sequined, iconic, sweated-upon-by-the-famous stuff, but stuff nonetheless, a gift shop for the eyes, hermetically sealed in Plexiglas.
The next day, Allen, Virginia, Kimberley and I played and/or sang at The Gathering in the company of  many like-minded but equally musically disparate performers. The sets were wonderful; the camaraderie was astonishing.
But the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame was still on my mind. And although I tout myself as a songwriter, the works of John Prine, Holland/Dozier/Holland and Lennon/McCartney found their way into my set. Thanks to Jay Cox, our Beatles collaboration included a roots-affirming 12 bar bottleneck blues solo. I credited Bo Diddley for his influence in my introduction of my own song Jani. I even tacked a verse of Under The Boardwalk onto the end of my own Can’t See the Ocean—  off the cuff and without throwing Bell Tone Easy, who was contributing percussion for the tune.
I wasn’t intending to make a statement and I didn’t. But thinking about it later, I realized that as cool as the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame is, it is only a building full of costumes and well-used guitars. Even from a performer with skills as modest as mine, the magic is in the songs, the playing of them and the hearing of them in a room full of friends.
I’m not knocking the Hall Of Fame. I’d go again. But it is because of what happens in little Ohio venues like Verlie’s, where performers use hands and voices to sketch the contents of  hearts and souls, this is the reason that I say, CLEVELAND ROCKS.
David Partridge


How UNLOVED UNDONE nearly undid POSTCARD COMETS

You know how you hear about those tracks that are pure inspiration, those creative lightning strikes that happen magically in a single perfect take?
This wasn’t one of those.
The writing process for the song was relatively smooth. The recording of the track, not so much.
I’d been doing some doodling myself. I had the song and the feel. At the end of a session with my co-Comet Buck, I played him my rhythm track and asked him to take a run at a guitar track while I sang the tune live in the room. He did a track, or two, or three, or four and went home to his warm bed and his cute cowboy jammies.
I left the track, as I often do, to revisit it in the cold light of the next day. When I ran the previous night’s work, I was pleased and then concerned. Oh, the guitar tracks were good. They were full of good ideas, too many good ideas. I loved them and had no idea how to use all of them. And I was in no mood to choose, so I set the song aside. For about a year.
About a month ago, I agreed to play at Gathering Stateside in Cleveland. As my partner Buck has previous commitments, I will be doing the shows solo. I’ve been trying out tunes that I could do at the Cleveland show. Flipping through my songbook, I rediscovered UNLOVED UNDONE.
But now I had another problem. The solo version I’ve been working on is intimate and the track was huge. It had piano, organ, bass, 3 percussion tracks, an oboe (!), a power chord guitar (samples played from a keyboard) and Buck’s four guitar tracks. And I wanted my acoustic guitar and vocal parts from the solo version on there as well.
I can’t tell you how often this happens, that the mix is a process of reducing the parts on a song and not just balancing them. The oboe and the power chords went first. Then the piano and organ were trimmed so that they weren’t both playing all the way through. Percussion got the same treatment.
Buck had done one guitar pass playing arpeggios because I asked him to. I love arpeggios but this track took up too much real estate. If I was going to strum my way through as well, it had to go. Three electric guitar tracks were left. I lined them up and tried to make them occupy the space of a single end-to-end guitar track. I failed. As it stands, it’s about a track and a half!
OK, the track was set. Time to go to the vocal. I did a guide take early on and as is often the case, grew to like it as the process went on. Time to mix. As I mixed however, I began to find fault with the vocal. So I stopped and did another. The next morning, I went back to mixing. This time, I had reservations about the new vocal! So, I comped the two into one, the one you hear on the tune. I did a mix and sent it to Buck.
So, weeks after we thought it would be done and a year after it was started, here it is. It almost got the better of us. But it didn’t.
Now, I’m telling you the inside scoop about how it almost defeated us but I expect you to keep it to yourself. And if anyone asks me from this point on, I plan to say,” Yeah, man, pure inspiration, lightning stuck for a magical, single perfect take.”
I expect you to back me up on this, too. After all, I’ve told you all of this in confidence!
David Partridge


My Second Paid Gig (the Sequel)

Our first gig was less than a triumph, although you wouldn’t know that by the story we told to anyone who had not been in attendance. But the original gig was early in October and by late November, the tale of our solitary gig was getting pretty tired. We desperately needed another show.
Our drummer had a solution. He had secured us a spot playing the Christmas party at a renowned clothing manufacturer. How was this possible for chancers like us? The drummer’s grandfather owned the company.
The company was Canada’s leading manufacturer of tartan garments. It was called Highland Queen. It was located in an ancient, multistory manufacturing building in Toronto’s downtown schmata district, right on Spadina Avenue. It was blocks south of the legendary El Mocambo where the Stones, Elvis Costello and even reggae legend Burning Spear took the stage, but it was a gig and a paid one at that.
When we got to the building, we were mildly distressed to find that our equipment had to be hauled up three substantial flights of stairs. But we had very little equipment to start with and we had a roadie, so we were one step ahead of our first gig.
OK, he wasn’t exactly a roadie. He was a friend of the drummer’s and he made no secret of the fact that he wanted to be in the band. He had no talent whatsoever which put him a step, albeit a small one, behind us. I recall that when we told him that he was not going to be in the band, he pointed out that he had already invested in an instrument. It was a pretty desperate guilt trip, especially considering that his instrument was a tambourine and that his investment consisted of having stolen it.
To be perfectly honest, he wasn’t much of a roadie either. He dropped my amp at the halfway point up those stairs and all that kept it from going all the way down was the fact that there was a landing every half storey. His reaction was, “Huh. Lucky I wasn’t at the top.”
But the amp still worked and we worked as well, in what must be admitted was not a very rock and roll environment. Our stage was an ancient hardwood floor, an aisle actually, between the management offices and rows and rows and rows of sewing machines. And behind each sewing machine was a little lady in a headscarf and an apron. I was not optimistic about our reception but throughout the set, every one of those ladies sat motionless, save for some polite clapping at the end of each number. The applause was indeed modest but they stayed to listen!
We were elated. That is, until we discovered that they had not yet received their pay packets. This transpired between our first and second sets. By the beginning of the second set, our audience was comprised solely of sewing machines, worn and silent. Not a headscarf nor an apron nor a seamstress to be seen. I think the drummer’s grandfather slipped out as well.
But his secretary did not. She was a lovely Scandinavian woman who became more and more enamoured of the band with each secreted refilling of the Yuletide goblet. The more white wine that passed over her lips, the more convinced she became that the band’s blond rhythm guitarist was also of Scandinavian descent. That was me and I was not. I was, however, terrified by the increasing proximity of this slim but slurry lady. Besides, she was kind of old, at least twenty-three.
If you are sensing a real rock and roll ending to this story, you are right. Shortly before the band made its exit, she made hers, by falling down those stairs. As I recall, the landing did not save her as it had my amp. In an effort to remount her high heels, she turned the corner and fell half way down the next flight.
By that time, we had discovered the freight elevator at the back. Our second artistic assault on the world was over.
(Second in a series of only two, thank heavens! Be sure to read the first gig blog below if you came in late. —-David)


All content © Postcard Comets